Statement by the Artists
Claes Oldenburg: Soft versions of the feathers were sewn, stuffed with foam rubber, and painted at a ship builder, Merrifield Roberts in Bristol, Rhode Island. A method of slicing the canvas was devised to produce the texture of feathers. In a preliminary sketch the Shuttlecock became a tightrope walker with its crown seen from below against the ceiling of the Guggenheim.
Coosje van Bruggen: Looking up and seeing the feathers against the glass ceiling, Frank Lloyd Wright's concept came to mind, that organic architecture should be "as natural as a flower by the wayside," an analogy that inspired the choice of the Soft Shuttlecock as a subject for the Guggenheim in the first place. Since different configurations of the feathers are possible, the sculpture becomes adaptable to other spaces as well, such as the Napoleon Hall of the Museo Correr, where the relatively small space increases the effect of scale. By coincidence, the chandeliers hanging from the ceiling correspond to the shuttlecock shape, while the oval form of the ballroom relates to the cone.
Germano Celant: The Knife Ship and the Houseball, 1996, move around but stay the same shape. The Soft Shuttlecock moves around too but changes wherever it is installed. It's a very strange animal. How do you feel about this kind of variation?

Taken from an interview with Germano Celant, as printed in Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen. Case histories by Oldenburg and van Bruggen. Texts: Germano Celant, 'Urban Marvels'; 'A Conversation with Coosje van Bruggen, Germano Celant and Claes Oldenburg'. Milan: Skira Editions, 1999. In English and Italian. 524 pp. Available through Rizzoli, NYC.